4 ms·

You need to read the thread.

by kadendogthing 8y ago

pvg 8y ago
Sadly, I have.
- kadendogthing 8y ago
  Your post is not indicative of someone who followed the thread. You would understand the contextual reasons for saying that, but instead you quoted it to sit here and involve yourself in this thread, for some odd reason. "If that's your #1 point" -- one only need to read the actual thread to understand the elementary timeline of what was being discussed. If you're here to troll just come out with it.
  - pvg 8y ago
    "famous" is the first thing you latch onto at the start of this thread. You mention it repeatedly throughout. You've labeled it #1 a comment or so ago. I'm trying to tell you it's a minor, silly misunderstanding, largely on your part.
    - kadendogthing 8y ago
      You're blaming me for responding to a comment that responded to me. But apparently everyone else was immune from this, despite the absolute derth of evidence to support their claims. The person replying to my comment is wrong about his point. DNSSEC is fine, it's seen as fine, and it will be continued to be implemented. Pretending otherwise is bland nerd contrarianism against standard bodies. Other severely erroneous claims were made about the security industry, and software development in general. Which apparently was beyond you to read. You are trolling. This whole thread is part of the reason many people who have the sense god gave them avoid this forum when attempting to discuss technical matters. Have a nice day.
      - tptacek 8y ago
        DNSSEC isn't famously bad the way Battlefield Earth and Gigli are; it's famously bad among people who know stuff about DNS security. You seem shocked that experts disdain it, and were unaware of AGL's "Why Not DANE In Browsers". Perhaps, before litigating DNSSEC further, you might read up on it a bit more. Either way, calling commenters on HN "trolls" violates the HN civility rules, and you need to stop doing that. You can read more about that in the Guidelines, linked at the bottom of this page.
        kadendogthing 8y ago
        >it's famously bad among people who know stuff about DNS security Well, I would assume named and Google know a lot about DNS security. I don't know why this is so difficult for you to understand. My first response to a completely different poster has served as an adequate response for quite literally every single reply to you in this thread, but this was apparently completely lost on you. The sentiment you so passionately hold is only seen in very particular circles, and really only in passing. Plus on your own twitter, you seem to be in the minority here: https://twitter.com/tqbf/status/1099804364368216065 https://twitter.com/tqbf/status/1099804364368216065 Your own screenshot said the exact opposite thing you thought it said. Thanks for that. I think your crusade against this is blinding you to some basic technical and social details. Also that poster is violating quite literally 4 rules in his posts. Please don't reference the rules if you won't do the same for people who are just here to support you. It's quite literally concern trolling. It's quite obvious from posting histories you guys consistently engage people who have dissenting opinions from you guys. How small of a person do you have to be to have a tiny cabal on HN?
        pvg 8y ago
        There are wheels within wheels in this village, and fires within fires! When Reverend Hale comes, you will proceed to look for signs of witchcraft here.

You need to read the thread.

pvg 8y ago

Sadly, I have.

kadendogthing 8y ago
Your post is not indicative of someone who followed the thread. You would understand the contextual reasons for saying that, but instead you quoted it to sit here and involve yourself in this thread, for some odd reason. "If that's your #1 point" -- one only need to read the actual thread to understand the elementary timeline of what was being discussed. If you're here to troll just come out with it.
- pvg 8y ago
  "famous" is the first thing you latch onto at the start of this thread. You mention it repeatedly throughout. You've labeled it #1 a comment or so ago. I'm trying to tell you it's a minor, silly misunderstanding, largely on your part.
  - kadendogthing 8y ago
    You're blaming me for responding to a comment that responded to me. But apparently everyone else was immune from this, despite the absolute derth of evidence to support their claims. The person replying to my comment is wrong about his point. DNSSEC is fine, it's seen as fine, and it will be continued to be implemented. Pretending otherwise is bland nerd contrarianism against standard bodies. Other severely erroneous claims were made about the security industry, and software development in general. Which apparently was beyond you to read. You are trolling. This whole thread is part of the reason many people who have the sense god gave them avoid this forum when attempting to discuss technical matters. Have a nice day.
    - tptacek 8y ago
      DNSSEC isn't famously bad the way Battlefield Earth and Gigli are; it's famously bad among people who know stuff about DNS security. You seem shocked that experts disdain it, and were unaware of AGL's "Why Not DANE In Browsers". Perhaps, before litigating DNSSEC further, you might read up on it a bit more. Either way, calling commenters on HN "trolls" violates the HN civility rules, and you need to stop doing that. You can read more about that in the Guidelines, linked at the bottom of this page.
      - kadendogthing 8y ago
        >it's famously bad among people who know stuff about DNS security Well, I would assume named and Google know a lot about DNS security. I don't know why this is so difficult for you to understand. My first response to a completely different poster has served as an adequate response for quite literally every single reply to you in this thread, but this was apparently completely lost on you. The sentiment you so passionately hold is only seen in very particular circles, and really only in passing. Plus on your own twitter, you seem to be in the minority here: https://twitter.com/tqbf/status/1099804364368216065 https://twitter.com/tqbf/status/1099804364368216065 Your own screenshot said the exact opposite thing you thought it said. Thanks for that. I think your crusade against this is blinding you to some basic technical and social details. Also that poster is violating quite literally 4 rules in his posts. Please don't reference the rules if you won't do the same for people who are just here to support you. It's quite literally concern trolling. It's quite obvious from posting histories you guys consistently engage people who have dissenting opinions from you guys. How small of a person do you have to be to have a tiny cabal on HN?
        pvg 8y ago
        There are wheels within wheels in this village, and fires within fires! When Reverend Hale comes, you will proceed to look for signs of witchcraft here.