4 ms·
"Absence of evidence does not mean evidence of absence" is false. Absence of evidence can very well mean evidence of absence depending on how hard we've looked.
by nollidge 16y ago
"Absence of evidence does not mean evidence of absence" is false. Absence of evidence can very well mean evidence of absence depending on how hard we've looked. People have looked really hard for evidence of Bigfoot and found nothing worthwhile, and it is reasonable to conclude that Bigfoot does not exist.
- hackermom 16y agoBy this stretch of logic of yours, the various photographs supposedly depicting Bigfoot must thusly be concluded to be reasonable evidence of Bigfoot's existence :)