3 ms·
As someone who doesn't eat meat or dairy I've heard the argument that the environmental impact would be less than a vegan that lives in a city. The argument be
by Accacin 8y ago
As someone who doesn't eat meat or dairy I've heard the argument that the environmental impact would be less than a vegan that lives in a city.
The argument being that a hunter is killing an animal that lived naturally is less of an environmental impact than getting food packaged and sent across the country, etc.
I'm not sure I agree, but it's the most plausible argument I've seen for not being Vegan.
- retzkek 8y ago> getting food packaged and sent across the country You missed the biggest factor: industrial farming. Have you been to the midwest-does that look like a healthy, natural ecosystem? A vegan (well, most people really ) who lives there gets their food from the same place as one in the city. I'm not sure any form of food production/gathering, at the scale needed today, would look any better though.