> I don't find dualism satisfying either; it is not a testable theory. I understand the sentiment here, but I also think we should be careful when it comes to

> I don't find dualism satisfying either; it is not a testable theory. I understand the sentiment here, but I also think we should be careful when it comes to the assumption that the truth -- whatever it happens to be -- will be a testable theory. Whether or not something is true is a fact independent of larger epistemological concerns. Then again, perhaps you're just saying that if the truth turns out to be non-testable, then the truth won't be satisfying, which is a reasonable position (and I might agree).