4 ms·
That sounds like a case against wealth inequality, since there’s no increase in happiness for the very rich.
by gotocake 8y ago
That sounds like a case against wealth inequality, since there’s no increase in happiness for the very rich.
- kartan 8y ago> That sounds like a case against wealth inequality, since there’s no increase in happiness for the very rich. Not necessarily. Inequality seems to bring unhappiness independently of wealth. You may have more than others. But if you get way less for your work than others, most people will be unhappy. That is why millionaires want more when they see the billionaires. This video helps to illustrate my point: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meiU6TxysCg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meiU6TxysCg
- downrightmike 8y agoPast a certain point of success, it is only a numbers game. As in once you have achieved your goals and are successful, you are still driven to become successful and money is a tangible way to measure that success. Whether anyone really needs the points to survive is not the question. The question is do they equate money with success?