> Again, I'm being swatted for suggesting that it might be a good thing for Amazon to plan around accidents. you're being swatted for the disingenuous grandsta

> Again, I'm being swatted for suggesting that it might be a good thing for Amazon to plan around accidents. you're being swatted for the disingenuous grandstanding of suggesting they should have a plan, when you already know what the plan of _every_ shipping company is[1], and you know that the portions relevant to you will be covered in the terms and conditions you skip over, despite the supposed importance of this subject to you. maybe you want them to have a different plan, but that's not what you're saying. [1]: refund shipping costs, and pay out whatever insurance was purchased on the shipment, subject to some contract-specified delay.