3 ms·
And these were not published on their website: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.10277.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.10277.pdf http://proceedings.mlr.press/v37/regi
by ethelward 8y ago
And these were not published on their website:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.10277.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.10277.pdf
http://proceedings.mlr.press/v37/regier15.pdf http://proceedings.mlr.press/v37/regier15.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.00113.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.00113.pdf
I had to go so far as to read the project Github page to find them.
- antpls 8y agoIn all those papers, there at least one member of the team in the author list, or a member of a partner organization (Intel, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, etc). I wouldn't call them fair independent reviews of the language.
- ethelward 8y agoAre you really complaining that the people writing about the tool are the ones developing it? Whose opinion do you want, the Pope? Would a divine sanction be enough for you?
- tremors_123 8y agoWould a divine sanction be enough for you? No, but a reliable and independent opinion will do it. And to be honest, the Julia fanboys are becoming increasingly bothersome and pernicious to the data-science community with their over the top and heavy handed evangelism