3 ms·
Yeaaaaah but it was on topic, in a chain of threads making fun how unsubstantive people’s skepticism was back in 2010 Your team tells me that upvotes/downvotes
by gammateam 8y ago
Yeaaaaah but it was on topic, in a chain of threads making fun how unsubstantive people’s skepticism was back in 2010
Your team tells me that upvotes/downvotes are noisy, but once you have downvotes it is unsubstantive and the account is rate limited
Pick
Your team also never explains how you mods interpret a guideline or substantiation, just unilaterally say it violates and pray for classical conditioning as if you want community standards to be decided by the community
If you are judging this primarily by flags and downvotes, you arent noticing that a lot of the collective conscious is just incorrect. It isnt as open to ideas as you might think
- dang 8y agoI'm happy to explain how we interpret specific cases, but not as part of a litigious process in which explanation only leads to more objections. If you want a serious answer, you'll need to do more to establish good faith.
- gammateam 8y ago> If you want a serious answer, you'll need to do more to establish good faith. Such as Karma over 1,000? What do you mean I think I’m doing pretty good, but what do you have in mind
- dang 8y agoWe've banned this account for trolling. If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html