That didn't even occur to me, that you'd find the term problematic. I just interpreted as colorful language. I find the denominator of the entire US[1] to be s

That didn't even occur to me, that you'd find the term problematic. I just interpreted as colorful language. I find the denominator of the entire US[1] to be somewhat misleading, as I said. More importantly, however, I found the emphasis to be on the working for someone else, not the magnitude of the salary. Perhaps even more importantly, the high annual salary may translate to a low hourly rate, especially with a long commute and on-call duty. For some, this may be such a substantial reduction in quality of life, that the salary is low enough to resemble a legume. [1]Do all US workers in the above denominator include self-employed contractors?