Having to go back 15 years for an example is usually a good predictor of the strength (or better: weakness) of an argument. The numbering has been very logical

Having to go back 15 years for an example is usually a good predictor of the strength (or better: weakness) of an argument. The numbering has been very logical for more than a decade: you have a product generation, and increasing numbers mean increased performance. What is so nonsensical about that?