> emergent problem How exactly is it a problem? Surely we'd rather overvalue CEOs than under-serve them? > these payouts are totally asymmetrical and complete

> emergent problem How exactly is it a problem? Surely we'd rather overvalue CEOs than under-serve them? > these payouts are totally asymmetrical and completely independent of how effective a CEO is What are good metrics for this claim? How should we measure effectiveness-salary ratio? Why should they not be asymmetrical? Just curious and trying to clarify the points being made.