4 ms·
It is a leftover piece from our arrogant past when we considered our image a reflection of the divine. It is now just a way to say, "not human". Unfortunately,
by whytaka 8y ago
It is a leftover piece from our arrogant past when we considered our image a reflection of the divine.
It is now just a way to say, "not human". Unfortunately, the embedded arrogance is still perpetuated.
- incompatible 8y agoIs it possible to make a distinction between things that are designed, with intelligence, and things that have obtained their form through haphazard forces or the actions of organisms following their genetically pre-programmed behaviour? Even if "nature" vs "artificial" are not the right words for it?