Hm, What if entities were limited in how many active contracts they could have outstanding in which they had an obligatory arbitration clause in play, based on

Hm, What if entities were limited in how many active contracts they could have outstanding in which they had an obligatory arbitration clause in play, based on how many employees they had? So, like, if you couldn’t have over 2 + 4*log_2(your number of employees) cases where people you either currently employ, or used to employ and are still bound by that clause of their employment contract, are subject to forced arbitration. (Or some other function. Sqrt might be better than log) This would still provide some of (hopefully most of) the benefit of having the arbitration, while preventing it from being common or typical amongst the employees, as the proportion of employees would have to be asymptotically zero as number of employees increases.