3 ms·
Ah, that makes sense. I'd initially interpreted it as some kind of engagement metric.
Ah, that makes sense. I'd initially interpreted it as some kind of engagement metric.
yep - I missed that concept too.
"...ordered by {time spent there}->(how long it was on the front page)"
Yes, I see how that was ambiguous. Have changed the language—is it clearer now?
If anyone can figure out how to make it shorter, let me know. It feels a bit wordy now.