3 ms·

>Redis itself isn't going to compete directly with Kafka. But there's nothing stopping some downstream developer from building something So this is a philosoph

>Redis itself isn't going to compete directly with Kafka. But there's nothing stopping some downstream developer from building something So this is a philosophical rather than a technical thing. For a hobbyist open source project, I would agree with you there - there's only so much resources that someone can carve out of his day job. For a company that raised a 60mil venture funding and specifically created a license to prevent IP leakage, this is disappointing. I want to pay Redis and I don't mind their licensing. But I'm then questioning the philosophy if everything meaningful has to be done by unpaid open-source developers/startups, who might be on tenuous footing to do anything meaningful with it because of the licensing.

derefr 8y ago
I think you're confusing Redis with Redis Labs. Redis is built by antirez as a "hobbyist open source project." It is a small core, and will stay that way. It is an infrastructure component. It is fully open-source. Redis Labs is the company that raised 60mil venture funding, and Redis Labs' business model is exactly to create such "distributions" of Redis for their customers. These distributions are not open-source; they are the thing that has the weird license. Redis Labs does not own or control Redis. antirez owns and controls Redis. You could create a similar company of your own which is also selling Redis distributions (as a product, as a service, etc.) and make money off of doing so. Since Redis itself—the thing antirez develops—is open-source, nothing stops you from doing this, just like nothing stops Redis Labs from doing this. No "unpaid open-source developers" are needed. antirez just happens to work for Redis Labs—but not in the sense that they can really tell him what to do. They just want to pay him to ensure he keeps making it, because their business depends on the continued health of the open-source project at its core. (It's about the same situation as Guido van Rossum working for Dropbox, or Yukihiro Matsumoto working for Heroku.) If you want to talk about the well-being of some project, downstream of Redis, to build a full-featured multipurpose DBMS "tool" with Redis at its core, that is fully open-source... well, that project doesn't exist. Redis Labs is not(!) that project; Redis Labs is a services company. But there's nothing stopping such a project from existing, and there's nothing stopping a foundation springing up around it to take care of it and its developers (like e.g. the Linux Software Foundation, or the PostgreSQL EU+US foundations.) But that software project, if it existed, would no more be "the Redis project" than https://openresty.org/en/ https://openresty.org/en/ is "the Nginx project." It'd just be a customized distribution, by separate people.

derefr 8y ago

I think you're confusing Redis with Redis Labs. Redis is built by antirez as a "hobbyist open source project." It is a small core, and will stay that way. It is an infrastructure component. It is fully open-source. Redis Labs is the company that raised 60mil venture funding, and Redis Labs' business model is exactly to create such "distributions" of Redis for their customers. These distributions are not open-source; they are the thing that has the weird license. Redis Labs does not own or control Redis. antirez owns and controls Redis. You could create a similar company of your own which is also selling Redis distributions (as a product, as a service, etc.) and make money off of doing so. Since Redis itself—the thing antirez develops—is open-source, nothing stops you from doing this, just like nothing stops Redis Labs from doing this. No "unpaid open-source developers" are needed. antirez just happens to work for Redis Labs—but not in the sense that they can really tell him what to do. They just want to pay him to ensure he keeps making it, because their business depends on the continued health of the open-source project at its core. (It's about the same situation as Guido van Rossum working for Dropbox, or Yukihiro Matsumoto working for Heroku.) If you want to talk about the well-being of some project, downstream of Redis, to build a full-featured multipurpose DBMS "tool" with Redis at its core, that is fully open-source... well, that project doesn't exist. Redis Labs is not(!) that project; Redis Labs is a services company. But there's nothing stopping such a project from existing, and there's nothing stopping a foundation springing up around it to take care of it and its developers (like e.g. the Linux Software Foundation, or the PostgreSQL EU+US foundations.) But that software project, if it existed, would no more be "the Redis project" than https://openresty.org/en/ https://openresty.org/en/ is "the Nginx project." It'd just be a customized distribution, by separate people.