What if the article was meant to stir up bad feelings amongst free-as-in-freedom GNU devs at both MS and open-source devs? What if it was meant to stir up bad

What if the article was meant to stir up bad feelings amongst free-as-in-freedom GNU devs at both MS and open-source devs? What if it was meant to stir up bad feelings by MS users who want us to think that it was stirred up by GNU devs? or maybe it was the GNU devs who want us to think that it was MS devs who really wanted us to think that it was GNU devs?