I think much of the guilty / not guilty verdict would come from the intent of the person who first obtained a copy. If they gained unauthorized entry into a co

I think much of the guilty / not guilty verdict would come from the intent of the person who first obtained a copy. If they gained unauthorized entry into a computer system to grab the test bank, and then advertised their intent to get a copy of the exam over emails on the UCF network, then they're sunk and should just take the amnesty deal. If they got a copy from a TA friend at another school, with the intent to use it as a study aid, then they're on the whiter side of the fuzzy grey line.