> This seems to really be stretching the point too far. "Social contract" is not some fixed legal meaning at all, I think you're getting into silly levels of ab

> This seems to really be stretching the point too far. "Social contract" is not some fixed legal meaning at all, I think you're getting into silly levels of abstractionism. Then according to the quote in dragonwriter's comment, so did Thomas Jefferson, a man not notable for silliness.