5 ms·
Those are some really good examples of the opposite of what you intended to say. > * Wonky unwieldy hypertext systems instead of the WWW Which ones? Gopher wa
by 5166cc9c39fa61 8y ago
Those are some really good examples of the opposite of what you intended to say.
> * Wonky unwieldy hypertext systems instead of the WWW
Which ones? Gopher wasn't hypertext, but it is still going and still a good idea. A conversion to Gopher would be a huge usability and accessibility upgrade for many current websites.
> * The Nomad instead of the iPod
iTunes is garbage. iPods sucked until (certain models) had Rockbox ported to them.
> * The Blackberry instead of the iPhone
How about the Nokia n900 instead?
> * GNU Hurd instead of Linux
I'm "stuck" with BSD. Send help?
Ambitious projects are cool and should be encouraged. Being an ignoramus about existing developments (not saying that that is what the people behind Matrix are doing) and getting distracted by anything that claims novelty should not be. Hoare had a great bon mot about this: "Here is a language [Algol 60] so far ahead of its time, that it was not only an improvement on its predecessors, but also on nearly all its successors."
- frandroid 8y ago> [Gopher] is still going Hum, yeah, most of the world is connecting through Gopher...
- cvwright 8y agoThe products you mention are all good examples of niche products for techies. If that's what you want, by all means keep XMPP and be happy with it.
- 5166cc9c39fa61 8y ago> The products you mention are all good examples of niche products for techies. The blind person that told me about how much better Gopher was than the modern web for blind people was not a techie, and I don't think it is moral to treat disabilities as just a "niche."
- innagadadavida 8y agoNo offense to the blind, but their rest of us do want funky graphics, emojis and cat gifs.
- admax88q 8y agoGopher support rich media, it just doesn't double as a client side application platform like the modern web does.