3 ms·
> I don't want to have different players for different shows This is at the heart of the control problem. If you have one true player, it commands more control
by sh87 8y ago
> I don't want to have different players for different shows
This is at the heart of the control problem. If you have one true player, it commands more control than is good for you, me and all consumers. Healthy competition is the only practical way to keep this under check.
I make sure to distribute my consumption over at least 2-3 contenders for any content be it search (google, ddg, bing), video (youtube, vimeo, dailymotion), podcasts (overcast, apple podcasts). I've begun extending this pattern over all sorts of consumption.
Sure its a hassle for me. I'm ok with it. I like to think that one extra click, one purchase, one download helps the competitors in keeping the market healthy.
- scrollaway 8y agoInsanity. There should be competition but compatibility. It shouldn't be about "one true player" as in one proprietary platform everyone uses (youtube vs spotify vs whatever), but rather every player is compatible with all of the formats. The proprietary-lockin epidemic is a serious issue. I think part of the problem is open standards don't often focus on the payments problem.
- sh87 8y agoFor dominant content distributors and platforms, there is real economic incentive for chasing deep lock-ins. And practically no incentive to comply with or contribute to any sort of standard. That is the unfortunate reality today. If we have reasonably good competition among these platforms, we may just have some hope there.