4 ms·
I just don't understand why Facebook doesn't provide a subscription option. I would be willing to pay $4.99/month or perhaps a bit more in exchange for no ads a
by angott 8y ago
I just don't understand why Facebook doesn't provide a subscription option. I would be willing to pay $4.99/month or perhaps a bit more in exchange for no ads and no tracking.
What is so wrong about being able to pay for things?
- nyrulez 8y agoIt won't be a $100B+ company. And that's important to them.
- RickS 8y agoIt blocks you from seeing the future. If they get money and no data, they're getting paid for who they are today with less insight into who they need to be tomorrow to keep getting paid. The idea that data is "just sold to businesses" and can be substituted for its sale-value equivalent in cash is wrong, IMO. Serious insight, product directions, election swinging power, really big shit – are all emergent properties of data in aggregate like this that are somewhat unknowable until you actually get the data and see things unfold. So what they're actually keeping, by choosing data over cash, is priceless long-term optionality.
- whiddershins 8y agoIf you let people pay for an ad free service, you just removed the most valuable users (target demographic) from your advertising pool.