3 ms·

The libertarian answer to this would seem to then be "Excellent; now anti-fascist organizations have an optimized channel to get their message to those people."

twblalock 8y ago
Also: now we know who the Nazis are.
- zdragnar 8y ago
  No, now you know who are interested in the Nazis, which includes no shortage of kids writing history reports for school.
- yellow_postit 8y ago
  “Know” is probably giving their targeting and classification a bit too much credit.
TuringNYC 8y ago
The libertarian answer is "to let the market decide" and walk with their pocketbook / talk with their wallet. That is all fine in theory but the theory doesn't address what happens when there is only a single dominant player. For example, if I "walk away with my wallet" on my cable tv provider, i'm done -- there is only one provider.
- blfr 8y ago
  Cable TV isn't a good example because "nothing" is a strong competitor and really much better than cable TV. But lately companies like VISA and MC seem to be abusing their semi-monopolies. Try living without a card or bank account.
- krapp 8y ago
  >That is all fine in theory but the theory doesn't address what happens when there is only a single dominant player. The market can decide that only one player is sufficient to its needs.
  - heurist 8y ago
    A single player that is strong enough can decide that the market will not have more than one player.
- leetcrew 8y ago
  Facebook and your cable company are similar in that they both offer a compelling (for some people, at least), yet unessential product. in these situations, you vote with your wallet by no longer using the service. there are issues with the libertarian "vote with your wallet" theory, but this is not one of them.
  - fixermark 8y ago
    How does Libertarian "vote with your wallet" theory deal with essential products?
    - leetcrew 8y ago
      there might be some diehard libertarians that disagree with me, but I think it's pretty obvious that the theory can't work when a company has a monopoly on a truly essential product.
      - noarchy 8y ago
        I live in a place (Canada) where even some non-essential products are monopolized not by private companies, but by the government. In fact, the only monopolies of which I am aware are created and mandated by government.

twblalock 8y ago

Also: now we know who the Nazis are.

zdragnar 8y ago
No, now you know who are interested in the Nazis, which includes no shortage of kids writing history reports for school.
yellow_postit 8y ago
“Know” is probably giving their targeting and classification a bit too much credit.

TuringNYC 8y ago

The libertarian answer is "to let the market decide" and walk with their pocketbook / talk with their wallet. That is all fine in theory but the theory doesn't address what happens when there is only a single dominant player. For example, if I "walk away with my wallet" on my cable tv provider, i'm done -- there is only one provider.

blfr 8y ago
Cable TV isn't a good example because "nothing" is a strong competitor and really much better than cable TV. But lately companies like VISA and MC seem to be abusing their semi-monopolies. Try living without a card or bank account.
krapp 8y ago
>That is all fine in theory but the theory doesn't address what happens when there is only a single dominant player. The market can decide that only one player is sufficient to its needs.
- heurist 8y ago
  A single player that is strong enough can decide that the market will not have more than one player.
leetcrew 8y ago
Facebook and your cable company are similar in that they both offer a compelling (for some people, at least), yet unessential product. in these situations, you vote with your wallet by no longer using the service. there are issues with the libertarian "vote with your wallet" theory, but this is not one of them.
- fixermark 8y ago
  How does Libertarian "vote with your wallet" theory deal with essential products?
  - leetcrew 8y ago
    there might be some diehard libertarians that disagree with me, but I think it's pretty obvious that the theory can't work when a company has a monopoly on a truly essential product.
    - noarchy 8y ago
      I live in a place (Canada) where even some non-essential products are monopolized not by private companies, but by the government. In fact, the only monopolies of which I am aware are created and mandated by government.