3 ms·
My local non-profit sharing community is already liable. That’s my point. You couldn’t write a blog and share music a record company produced without permissio
by jaabe 8y ago
My local non-profit sharing community is already liable. That’s my point.
You couldn’t write a blog and share music a record company produced without permission. As soon as it was found, it would be taken down and you’d get fined.
Why should YouTube or Facebook have that advantage over you?
- icebraining 8y agoNo, that's not true; a community that runs a photo hosting service is certainly protected if some user uploads protected content, just like YouTube (under the Electronic Commerce Directive 2000/31/EC). They would only not have protection if the copyright holder could prove the hosting community itself purposefully hosted such content. But neither would YouTube if they did the same.