3 ms·
SSID's pretty much ARE tied to geo, and those that aren't tied are easy to identify. The basic tech is known to both major players [1,2]. First you crowdsource
by imglorp 8y ago
SSID's pretty much ARE tied to geo, and those that aren't tied are easy to identify. The basic tech is known to both major players [1,2]. First you crowdsource as much of the data collection as you can: various apps can collect both SSID, BT, etc. sightings and report them with GPS. So you have a giant DB of locations vs network IDs. Then you tag any network ID which appears at differing locations: it's somehow mobile for whatever reason. The untagged ones are not mobile and probably dependable indications of location to within a few dozen meters. If they do move, they get tagged at your next sweep.
1. https://www.theverge.com/2011/05/12/google-android-skyhook-lawsuit-motorola-samsung https://www.theverge.com/2011/05/12/google-android-skyhook-l...
2. https://xconomy.com/boston/2010/08/04/skyhook-wireless-digs-in-touts-location-patents-after-apple-drops-technology-from-iphone/ https://xconomy.com/boston/2010/08/04/skyhook-wireless-digs-...
- reaperducer 8y agoSSID's pretty much ARE tied to geo, and those that aren't tied are easy to identify. I bring an AirMac (Apple Airport Express) with me to hotels when I travel. I guess this is why my Android phone gets so confused about where I am if it's in airplane mode with wifi enabled.