4 ms·

Even for simple arrows, I'd go with the multitude of unicode arrows. This has the added benefit of screen reader support. -- edit: I'm not sure why I can't r

Even for simple arrows, I'd go with the multitude of unicode arrows. This has the added benefit of screen reader support. -- edit: I'm not sure why I can't reply to you below, but here are some of the unicode arrows: http://img.skitch.com/20101119-n8558618t59wn8gdw5n6buax3d.medium.jpg http://img.skitch.com/20101119-n8558618t59wn8gdw5n6buax3d.me... It's easy enough to get screen readers to ignore it, if it is truly presentational.

necolas 16y ago
I'm not sure some simple arrows can be achieved with unicode characters...nor would you want a screenreader to pay attention to what is purely presentational.
necolas 16y ago
Thanks, you're right, plenty of options - http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/arrows.html http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/arrows.html But there doesn't seem to be one for the simplest: just a basic triangle.
- moe 16y ago
  Look here: http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/geometric_shapes.html http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/geometric_shapes.html