3 ms·
>You're displeased that their algorithm is too sensitive and flagged your content as a false positive, right? No. As I said, their rules. I have no idea if it
by pgrote 8y ago
>You're displeased that their algorithm is too sensitive and flagged your content as a false positive, right?
No. As I said, their rules. I have no idea if it is a false positive since I cannot get an answer as to what guideline was violated. I could have violated one of their guidelines.
Youtube doesn't owe me anything ... I use their service for free with unlisted videos to share with family. They make no money off the videos.
My point was if they can flag something like my video, I am sure they can flag the ones given as examples attracting the other people.
I can understand your point that false positives would generate more upset content creators who do make their videos public and would like ads run against them.
- stickfigure 8y agoYou point out that there are similar videos in the system that aren't getting flagged, which makes a pretty good argument that the algorithm is random and ineffective.