3 ms·
>local reports indicate the lanes would run from Stockton to Bakersfield, a distance of approximately 240 miles via I-5 or 230 miles via CA-99. I've driven the
by koboll 8y ago
>local reports indicate the lanes would run from Stockton to Bakersfield, a distance of approximately 240 miles via I-5 or 230 miles via CA-99.
I've driven these probably 30 times each. The standard minimum speed there in the daytime is already 80-90 mph in the fast lane.
Getting stuck behind some asshole who actually goes the speed limit in the fast lane isn't just annoying (it can add an hour to an SF => LA trip), it's also dangerous. It encourages people to pass by dodging and weaving through the line of much slower semi trucks in the slow lane. Also, CHP likes to hide under overpasses to hand out tickets, so people tend to slow down before them and then speed up again after them.
All these lane changes and speed changes are much, much likelier to cause accidents than high speed is. The road would be a lot safer if people in the fast lane were encouraged to all drive at the same high speed. This bill is a fantastic idea.
- jacobolus 8y agoCars driving slowly in the left lane is occasionally annoying, but in my experience the much more common problem with the 5 is that with 2 lanes and lots of semi trucks, there are frequently trucks passing trucks, and a lot of entitled car drivers will see the left lane moving slowly and try to pass on the right.... which of course they can’t actually do because there was a truck passing a truck, so you get lots of unsafe leapfrogging.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- cozos 8y agoI've gotten pulled over on the SF <=> LA I-5 before for going 91 MPH (somewhere in the middle on a steep downhill). The policeman told me with a straight face that I should go no faster than 65 MPH.