> On the other hand, for centuries it's been recognized that the best antidote to "bad speech" isn't censorship, it's more speech. Don't ban, convince. The pro

> On the other hand, for centuries it's been recognized that the best antidote to "bad speech" isn't censorship, it's more speech. Don't ban, convince. The problem with that here is that the medical industry is actually wrong. They want to censor speech because they are the bad science, and people are figuring it out. If they were right, then yes, "more speech" would be a great strategy.