>> ML can detect kids in videos > It can't detect context, however. You don't actually need to, at least initially. You only need to detect kids, and when you

>> ML can detect kids in videos > It can't detect context, however. You don't actually need to, at least initially. You only need to detect kids, and when you have some threshold of reports on comments on a video where the computer vision algorithm detected kids in the frame that rise to the level a human should take a look, the human can flag the video as containing elements of CP, which would kick in the following: - Deeper ML analysis of the dependency graph of commentors, related videos. - Blacklisting or law enforcement notification for commentors that are violating the law. - Training data that can be used to train more advanced algorithms. Because there is no profit motive to do so, like there is with music licensing, they won't do it. > It's technically easier to do so. I'm not talking about determining context with ML. That is a hard problem, of course. But identifying "child human" with a computer vision algorithm is very simple, then relying on human moderators to initiate the dependency graph traversal. > Please go read about how ML works before making such comments in the future, they make you look really stupid. No need for the ad hominem. I'm not an ML expert, but I understand enough of the basics to know what is possible.