Change is something many people are naturally averse to, so to change something there should be a good reason for it. If you sell something and people choose t

Change is something many people are naturally averse to, so to change something there should be a good reason for it. If you sell something and people choose to use it to solve a problem, that's great. If you force change on someone, and not only not deliver any benefit to them, but actually make things worse, expect pushback. Remember too that most people's systemd impact wasn't just replacing init, it was a whole raft of changes from log formats to dns. Imagine you had a working systemd setup and someone came along and replaced everything. They claim that there are use cases it's better for, but you don't see yourself with those use cases. You would be averse to that change. You then find out that pretty much every distribution going has got rid of systemd. I suspect you wouldn't be happy.