I need to say I am a bit confused, I maybe replied in the wrong place. I meant to reply to a comment that only provided as an information that somebody believe

I need to say I am a bit confused, I maybe replied in the wrong place. I meant to reply to a comment that only provided as an information that somebody believed to be a token black hire. To this my point was that multiple non trivial interpretation were possible. Now I realize I commented directly on the article so that I was in practice casting doubt on the content. This was a mistake, to be clear I trust the Edray Goins version of his own story. A bit late to reply, but I feel it is an important distinction.