10 ms·
I've also felt annoyed about the dishonesty of the blood donation market but that makes actually "some" sense. then again they should just register donors and
by rv-de 8y ago
I've also felt annoyed about the dishonesty of the blood donation market but that makes actually "some" sense. then again they should just register donors and extensively check them plus paying. then everybody wins.
- PhasmaFelis 8y agoRunning extensive checks before each donation would dramatically increase the cost, I would think.
- SilasX 8y agoYou don't do it on each donation, you screen specific people and then disproportionately use them.
- CharlesColeman 8y ago> then again they should just register donors and extensively check them plus paying. then everybody wins. That probably won't work. You want donors to voluntarily disqualify themselves when they become ineligible (like if they've started taking a prohibited mediation), and they're going to be less likely to do that if they're coming in to get paid. You can't monitor their lives 100% and I doubt it's practical to run screening tests for every problem. To use a software analogy: it's defense in depth strategy. Their polices screen for honesty, and then they do technical screening as a further check. Neither's perfect, but together they're probably more effective than either alone.