32 ms·
Why not replace it by MD-6?
by anticensor 8y ago
Why not replace it by MD-6?
- Someone1234 8y agoMD-6 never gained popularity and was eliminated early in the SHA-3 competition since it lacked proofs that it could resist differential attacks. Microsoft are quite correct to use SHA-2 (conservative choice) but SHA-3 would also be fine. Bringing up MD-6 at all seems arbitrary.