At some point someone at SIA would have thought about covering up the cameras (surely?), I imagine it would have been: 1. Accept the OEM design (cameras uncove

At some point someone at SIA would have thought about covering up the cameras (surely?), I imagine it would have been: 1. Accept the OEM design (cameras uncovered) but possibly have to deal with people not liking a camera shoved in their face (camera active or inactive) 2. Modify the OEM design (cover the camera, costing money) and nobody even knows that there was a camera there in the first place So I'm curious as to why they chose #1. A pure cost-saving exercise? Reserving use of the cameras at a later time? Didn't have the option of modifying the design? Didn't think people would mind the thought of being filmed?