4 ms·
Computational Neural Networks are getting further and further from the reality of their inspirational biological models. It'd be interesting to see some of thi
by tectonic 16y ago
Computational Neural Networks are getting further and further from the reality of their inspirational biological models. It'd be interesting to see some of this physiology research transition into revised computational models.
- pavs 16y agoThere's more than one way to skin a cat. By design Evolution is not perfect, which suggests there are better ways to create AI. To me it seems that trying to replicate how our human brain works is a wrong approach. On the other hand, there is no reason why we cannot replicate human brain design if we wanted to[1]. Evolution had millions of years and we are just getting our hands wet. [1]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11734909 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11734909
- _delirium 16y agoAI is also not always about building a human out of silicon, but about building something that is in some specific ways better (albeit much worse in other ways). For example, we ideally want to understand what it's doing and why, something we so far understand fairly imperfectly for humans. We also want to be able to control it fairly directly and reliably--- a society of AIs that you have to herd like cats and coax into doing what you want isn't quite what most engineers looking to plug in intelligent modules into their systems are looking for. We also want it to be very reliable and fast at tasks that humans do poorly or get bored doing, like scanning huge quantities of data to find patterns. At least, that's how it looks from an engineering side. If the end result is that all you get is a human, well, we already have humans; just hire them instead. From a philosophical and technical side creating artificial humans does still remain quite fascinating.