<i>You could very well say he's the raison d'être of Apple as we know it.</i> No. That has to be Jobs. Even back in the days of Apple I and Apple II, it seems

<i>You could very well say he's the raison d'être of Apple as we know it.</i> No. That has to be Jobs. Even back in the days of Apple I and Apple II, it seems like Jobs made Apple the company, even if it was Woz spearheading Apple the computer. Did Woz even work on anything at Apple beyond the Apple II series? (I don't know, but I don't think so) However, I don't know if this makes Woz any less qualified than anyone else on the planet to comment on cell phones. He certainly strikes me as more qualified than most.