> Call me a pessimist but the consumers will likely get shafted. You're a pessimist! Actually I don't see that there would be much difference. The car will pe

> Call me a pessimist but the consumers will likely get shafted. You're a pessimist! Actually I don't see that there would be much difference. The car will perform at some level of skill and have an associated risk, lets say that amounts to $50/mo. The customer could pay the manufacturer to pay the insurance company, or the customer could pay directly -- same thing?