4 ms·
Can you please make a similar list for the Democratic party?
by tomp 8y ago
Can you please make a similar list for the Democratic party?
- kadendogthing 8y agoI actually can't. I have tried.
- AnimalMuppet 8y agoIn your "trying", you list the Bush emails but not the Clinton emails? You aren't trying very hard...
- kadendogthing 8y agoOne thing doesn't make a list. Clinton did hand over emails, and the deletions were vetted by lawyers and government officials. She did this back in 2014, two years before the election. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy#Deletion_of_emails https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controve... and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy#House_Oversight_Committee_hearing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controve... Oh, and the Clinton email controversy only had 0.6% of the emails involved in the Bush email controversy.
- _bxg1 8y agoBill Clinton... cheated on his wife that one time
- jjeaff 8y agoWith that very young intern in his employ. Traditionally known as sexual harassment. Of course that was just one of the many cases of impropriety with women and allegations of assault.
- _bxg1 8y agoFrom my understanding it was consensual, which is not harassment. Not quite the same as "grabbing her by the p*y".
- jjeaff 8y agoMany will argue that there is no way to know if there was true consent when there is such a power differential between the two parties and especially when the act is taking place in the workplace between boss and subordinate. Which is why most workplaces require any kind of relations like this to be declared in writing to HR or in some cases forbidden all together.
- webdevatlurk 8y agoThis is a fun read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_political_scandals_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_political_scan... Edit: looks like somebody already posted it while I got distracted reading it.
- kadendogthing 8y agoThat's just a list of scandals under the timeline of then-present administrations. It is not actions taken by the administration that they are categorized under. You claim it's a fun read, but I think you can only claim that if you decided to actually read it. And the evidence points to the fact that you very obviously didn't.