Perhaps I missed it, but the point of the article seems to be that eventually a complex "neuro" computer will be to complicated to understand and produce unacco

Perhaps I missed it, but the point of the article seems to be that eventually a complex "neuro" computer will be to complicated to understand and produce unaccountable results. The Author makes a few poor assumptions about analog vs digital computing and seems to ramble a lot, but ultimately, his main point doesn't have much to do with either.