4 ms·
I think that what is so great about chrome is the lack of useless feature and focus on the core ones (speed to name only this one). Mozilla, by contrast, seems
by d0m 16y ago
I think that what is so great about chrome is the lack of useless feature and focus on the core ones (speed to name only this one). Mozilla, by contrast, seems to say Yes to everything and by any means become really slow. On my mac, I need to test on both browser and the speed difference between those browsers is phenomenal. Seriously, if firebug was on chrome, I wouldn't need firefox anymore. (I'm a bit sad about that)
- paulirish 16y ago> Seriously, if firebug was on chrome, I wouldn't need firefox anymore. I'm working with the Chrome Dev Tools team to make them even better. Would love to hear more from you on what needs to happen. :)
- buerkle 16y agoFirebug has the option to show XHRs inline with the console. Also, in chrome console.dir prints the object collapsed. I find it annoying to have to expand the object in the console when clearly I want to see the object's properties.
- paulirish 16y agoGood call on auto-opening those objects-- I'll file that with the team. You can right-click in the console to turn on XHR logging.
- carussell 16y agoWhat features does Firefox have that Chrome doesn't?
- thristian 16y agoThey might not be built-in, but the two things that sent me back to Firefox after using Chrome for ten minutes were: - Chrome has no "Allow web pages to choose their own fonts" checkbox that I can uncheck. The web is a hideous typographic cacophony without this option. - Chrome doesn't have the TreeStyleTabs extension. Chrome's default tab-handling is better than Firefox's default tab-handling, but TreeStyleTabs is just better. Since I last tried using Chrome, Firefox 4 nightlies gained the new Tab Panorama feature, which is possibly even better than TreeStyleTabs unless you have a lot of tabs in your working set.