4 ms·
That sentence was poorly worded. But then if this least generous interpretation you chose represented my train of thought, one would have expected me to clearl
by jancsika 8y ago
That sentence was poorly worded.
But then if this least generous interpretation you chose represented my train of thought, one would have expected me to clearly argue that both "road cameras" and "mobile service providers" are illegal. Instead I replied with, "Agreed." Did you read down to those parts? If so I'm curious what you thought that could mean in a worldview where police cannot legally investigate crimes.
- fixermark 8y agoNo, the error was mine. I zoned out on details because I misinterpreted your earlier sentence and assumed the remainder of the post was poor justification of my misunderstanding of your thesis.
- jancsika 8y agoAh, I see. That makes a lot of sense now that I think about it. If the initial thesis sounds fatuous, inconsistencies that come later wouldn't necessarily stand out.
- michaelmrose 8y agoThis is surprisingly civil for an internet discussion forum. Kudos on having good manners.