6 ms·
Slack and Github were so worried about someone cybersquatting that they were willing to pay $11,500 each to get those domains today? I guess that's the point of
by snowwolf 8y ago
Slack and Github were so worried about someone cybersquatting that they were willing to pay $11,500 each to get those domains today? I guess that's the point of the Dutch auction system, but still seems like a waste of money.
- arkitaip 8y agoIt's the cost of coffee for a couple of days or so.
- snowwolf 8y agoIs this Venezuelan coffee? https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-venezuela-cafe-con-leche-index/?terminal=true https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-venezuela-cafe-con-l... But note I think you mean the $12 price but that’s only available from the 28th Feb. To buy today it is $11,500 (unless as others have pointed out you got it as part of the trademark sunrise period)
- lgierth 8y agoThe sunrise period for trademark owners was a whole month until today, with a much more reasonable price tag.
- morpheuskafka 8y agoFor Microsoft (which owns GitHub) that is a tiny expense, but if they couldn't really afford it they could just file a dispute under UDRP.
- reaperducer 8y agoBut does the money come from Microsoft or from GitHub? In a lot of the large companies I've worked, money is siloed from one operating unit to the next. They would send bills between units and sometimes even departments. The larger the company, the more common this seemed. It's not one giant piggy bank.
- 0xffff2 8y agoDoes it really matter? Surely $11k is still a tiny amount for GitHub.
- mixmastamyk 8y ago~One month salary for a senior dev.
- fgonzag 8y agoJunior most likely
- JMTQp8lwXL 8y agoIf you buy the domain during trademark holder's period, you pay the normal price, and not the day 1 landrush price. So no, Slack et. al. did not pay $11,500 to secure their name.
- sdinsn 8y ago11k for a large company barely registers on their radar.