3 ms·
I really want to agree, but there are some situations where it does need to be that one doctor. The below anecdote notwithstanding, I do agree that any patient
by rkangel 8y ago
I really want to agree, but there are some situations where it does need to be that one doctor. The below anecdote notwithstanding, I do agree that any patient who demands your personal number is the last patient you should be giving it to.
My aunt had a condition that causes fluid build up in her brain. She has a slightly unusual shunt arrangement, and over Christmas (we now know) it got blocked up. She started developing neurological symptoms, and the only person who knew enough about her treatment to be able to sort it out was her doctor.
The actually had his home landline number, but he was away, and it was only due to luck of a call coinciding with the neighbour feeding the cat that they were able to get the number of where he was for Christmas. By that point, my aunt with unconscious in hospital, and might well have died if treatment had been delayed any more.
- scarmig 8y agoThanks for sharing that story. It's scary that sheer happenstance saved your aunt's life. I wonder how medical record keeping could be improved to help with that scenario.
- rkangel 8y agoWhat's scary to me is that after 10 attempts at the landline over a period of time, I would have (correctly but unhelpfully) concluded that he was away for Christmas and abandoned that approach. My Uncle was more persistent. In this case I think it was less knowledge of the particular case, and more the expertise in that specialised situation. Skillset rather than records.
- scarmig 8y agoWell, here's to hoping we'll all be seeing an all-knowing Dr. Google in 50 years.