4 ms·
I'm not sure why you're so against any sort of action here, but I am sure that that attitude is part of the reason we should be worried. Why are you assuming I
by rnernento 8y ago
I'm not sure why you're so against any sort of action here, but I am sure that that attitude is part of the reason we should be worried.
Why are you assuming I want to force solar and wind? What if I'm a huge proponent of nuclear power? What if I don't have a solution. What if I'm just trying to point out that we're in trouble.
"It's much more responsible to keep using the resources we have, become better at utilizing them keep developing new methods."
Can you explain this fully. What specifically are you planning we do? How will that correlate to the rise in global temperatures.
I know this is xkcd but I think it's pretty effective at conveying what we're up against:
https://xkcd.com/1732/ https://xkcd.com/1732/
- ThomPete 8y agoI am not against any sort of action. I am just not for overinvesting in inferior products like solar and wind and claiming the sky is falling as if we are doomed if we don't go to some sort of extreme. We don't need governments to pick winners it's a waste of resources. We need them to state what criteria energy production should meet. That's how you do things rationally and with your head rather than your emotions. I could ask you another question. How far are you ready to go? Are you going to war with China over coal? With India? Are you going to hinder developing countries from using fossil fuels? If you really believe it's catastrophic then drastic measures are going to be needed not just feel good things like going vegan and saying "i believe in climate change"