3 ms·
What a bizarre argument. You could replace "static" with "dynamic" and you would have an equivalent argument that would just as strongly (i.e., in fact, weakly)
by CogitoCogito 8y ago
What a bizarre argument. You could replace "static" with "dynamic" and you would have an equivalent argument that would just as strongly (i.e., in fact, weakly) argue against dynamic typing. This logical hole is obvious enough to drive a bus through. I don't understand how the author wouldn't have noticed it.
- fdgionionoi 8y agoThe logical hole is not obvious. If it were obvious, we would all notice it, and the fact that the author didn't notice it suggests it's not obvious.
- Varcht 8y agoI guess this is what happens when everyone gets a trophy.
- agildehaus 8y agoThere's a joke about not checking his types in here somewhere.