4 ms·
Do you have a citation for wide discreditation? Wikipedia is more circumspect > Bateson's double bind theory was never followed up by research into whether fa
by tome 8y ago
Do you have a citation for wide discreditation? Wikipedia is more circumspect
> Bateson's double bind theory was never followed up by research into whether family systems imposing systematic double binds might be a cause of schizophrenia. This complex theory has been only partly tested, and there are gaps in the current psychological and experimental evidence required to establish causation [citation?]. The current understanding of schizophrenia emphasizes the robust scientific evidence for a genetic predisposition to the disorder, with psychosocial stressors, including dysfunctional family interaction patterns, as secondary causative factors in some instances.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_bind#Schizophrenia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_bind#Schizophrenia
(Which makes me wonder: if the predisposition is genetic, why don't we have schizophrenic families? After all, they have the same genes!)
- skohan 8y agoI think it's highly unlikely that there is any meaningful causal link between a particular parenting style and Schizophrenia. We currently have a very robust physiological understanding of the disorder, and the symptomatology is linked to observable structural changes in the brains of Schizophrenic individuals. As with many psychological disorders, there appears to be a stress component: i.e. individuals may be more or less predisposed to the disorder, and therefore some individuals will only ever experience symptoms if triggered by a high level of stress, while for others it's unavoidable. So in some cases, yes it's possible that a problematic family life was the stressor that pushed them over the edge to develop full-blown Schizophrenia, but that person might have equally been effected by being mugged at gunpoint, or going through prolonged sleep deprivation during basic training in the military. The causal mechanism is almost certainly an interaction with Cortisol or other stress hormones, or some other well understood biological pathway. It's outdated pseudoscience at this point to take seriously the idea that Schizophrenia is the result of mixed messages during childhood.
- naasking 8y ago> We currently have a very robust physiological understanding of the disorder, and the symptomatology is linked to observable structural changes in the brains of Schizophrenic individuals. While I agree overall with your point, I think your wording emphasizes a common but mistaken view that psychological experience can't induce physiological changes in the brain. This is obviously false.
- skohan 8y agoYeah I absolutely agree that there is a feedback loop by which neural activity actually shapes physiology. But there’s also a degree to which psychological disorders are contributed to by errant thought patters, verses being the result of a functional problem with the brain as an organ. For example, with some forms of depression cognitive behavioral therapy (changing your thought patterns about certain things) can be very effective, while in the case of serious bipolar disorder, medication may be the only way to mitigate manic episodes. For lack of a better analogy, there’s a degree to which different disorders are the result of a software problem or a hardware problem, and all the evidence points to Schitzophrenia as being firmly toward that hardware end of the spectrum.
- naasking 8y agoI again agree with everything you've said, but to tie this all back to the article and the microbiome, while the body does have discrete, specialised organs, we have to recognise that they are leaky abstractions. Microbiota could influence psychology and thus physiology, or it could directly affect physiology and thus psychology. The fact fecal transplants triggered schizophrenic behaviours in mice shows there's some direct connection here that needs explanation.
- DanBC 8y ago> The fact fecal transplants triggered schizophrenic behaviours in mice What are schizophrenic behviours in mice?
- naasking 8y agoThey discuss this in the article and the linked study which did the transplants. You're best off consulting those.
- skohan 8y ago> Microbiota could influence psychology and thus physiology, or it could directly affect physiology and thus psychology. On maybe it's neither and also both. Personally I think Physiology vs Psychology is the wrong terminology to use: Psychology's domain is the mind which is a somewhat abstract concept, and usually refers to things in terms of thoughts and emotions. Our "psychology" is an emergent property of our physiology, but to me it seems like the wrong abstraction to use as a reference point when speaking about the pathology of something like Schizophrenia. Rather, what I think we're more concretely talking about is the division between nervous system structure (physiology), and activity (which includes, but is broader than psychology). To me, saying the physiology affects the physiology implies the wrong interpretation: i.e. it would be inaccurate to say that the gut bacteria made rat feel certain emotions or have certain thoughts, and those led to long term structural damage. However, it might very well be the case that the gut biome causes a neural activity pattern which leads to long-term pathological adaptations in nervous system structure. If I had to guess, there's probably not a one-way causal relationship, but these systems likely feed back on each-other in a way which results in the symptomatology we describe as Schizophrenia.
- ericb 8y agohttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2285075 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2285075 https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-3-319-15877-8_482-1 https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-3... https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/ghost-schizophrenogenic-mother/2013-09 https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/ghost-schizophr...