The problem I have with that view is that the information that get reported from current left-wing political parties and politicians do not match books like tho

The problem I have with that view is that the information that get reported from current left-wing political parties and politicians do not match books like those. It could be that: 1) The journalist reporting is wrong. 2) the current left-wing political parties are not left-wing. 3) the books are not about current left-wing politics, which has changed compared to when those books were written. For example, Debt: the First 5,000 Years has quite a lot to say about bridge gifts and gender roles which do not blame white men or use some "Patriarchy" theory where women are slaves to men. It does not make women to victim and men to conquers, but rather looking at the issue from a tribal/family resource perspective from an age when those practices were more common. That would be right-wing political view for a lot of people.