4 ms·
As I and wikipedia understand it, "Color grading is the process of improving the appearance of an image..."
by Varcht 8y ago
As I and wikipedia understand it, "Color grading is the process of improving the appearance of an image..."
- StavrosK 8y agoI mean, even then, "improving" is entirely subjective. Color grading is the process by which you edit a video to perform global color/tone adjustments, but I don't understand it as being strictly about improving, you might want the video to look old, in which case you'd grade it in a way that it deteriorates.
- Varcht 8y agoReally it is not that subjective, there is an art to it, there is some nuance to a mood or style you are going for but there is a definite good and bad.
- jacobolus 8y ago“Good” or “bad” printing (to use the darkroom photo term) can only really be defined relative to artistic intentions. There are many possible choices to make in producing a final image, many competing aesthetic goals which cannot all be satisfied simultaneously, and no “right” answer. Some photo printers love to allocate almost all of their available contrast to large-scale shapes, producing essentially silhouettes. Others like to allocate almost all contrast to local fine detail, leaving the image looking like a gray blur from afar but detailed and crisply textured from close up. Some photographers like their images to be a festival of competing intense colors, while others make nearly monochromatic images in one color or another, or stick to a pastel palette, or make mostly neutral images with a few intense exceptions. Etc. When someone says a photo or video was printed badly, what they usually mean is that either (a) the printer had shallow aesthetic judgment or boring artistic goals, and/or (b) the printer lacked the skill to effect their artistic vision.