3 ms·
> I'm not a climate sceptic and I'm not trying to debunk the entire thing. This is a thread about disinformation and I'm pointing out an instance of disinformat
by fzeroracer 8y ago
> I'm not a climate sceptic and I'm not trying to debunk the entire thing. This is a thread about disinformation and I'm pointing out an instance of disinformation.
You're pointing out an 'instance of disinformation' by using a site known for disinformation and spreading disinformation. Don't lie now, we both know exactly what you were trying to pull.
- SuddsMcDuff 8y agoYou're ignoring the easily verifiable facts that I have shown you. Instead choosing to bury your head in the sand and make assumptions. You are wilfully ignorant.
- fzeroracer 8y agoAnd you're a liar refusing to provide me with an actual proper citation or resource. If these are easily verifiable facts, then I would expect you could find me a reputable climatologist that debunks the claims made. Neither of us are climatologists and can make claims as to whether or not someone nitpicking an incredibly tiny portion of a paper (which has more data corroborating the growth in temperature) invalidates the whole thing. I have long learned not to trust climate skeptics to debate in good faith. So please, provide a proper source.
- SuddsMcDuff 8y agoIf the people who operate the weather station explicitly saying that its data should not be used for long term interpretation isn't credible enough for you, frankly I don't know what would be. Once again, I am not a 'climate skeptic'. You need to dial down your irrational hatred.