> I don't know what the real impact is, but if your site shows me blank page without javascript(I have it off by default) I am closing the tab. I can show you

> I don't know what the real impact is, but if your site shows me blank page without javascript(I have it off by default) I am closing the tab. I can show you "this site requires Javascript" instead, but let's just say you're not part of the target audience and that's fine. > I don't think supporting noscript version is costly because for me that's how it supposed to be by default. That highly depends on the site, of course. > 90% sites that are currently on the internet would work just fine without any js and 95% would work with as little as hackernews has. 99.9% of websites are not actually businesses that employ developers. If that's your standard, I agree. A simple webpage does not require Javascript.